Best Of
Re: April 20th Vengeance Only..
Jabbs_Giggity wrote: »If they would stop doing these tests (as the very vocal anti-Vengeance players demand it), what should ZOS be doing instead? If the answer is nothing, then you've pretty much doomed Cyrodiil for everyone.
Idk, maybe test it themselves instead of using unpaid player base to test a concept that most are against.
Perhaps forcing their own employees to test it, instead of us, will give them some actual insight into PVP and they'll learn something? Wishful thinking...
They can never replicate the scenarios you get in live cyro with internal testing. Ever.
albertberku wrote: »Well i listed 3 builds actually. 1: DoT with Maarselok (10% usage). 2: DK (60%), 3: Damage/Burst lines subclass (15%).
And vengeance is 100% nightblades so what is your point?
There will always be a “meta” in every single aspect of the game that people will naturally migrate to. The toxic PvE community is forever reminding of us that: “no you can’t join my raid team because you don’t have an arcanist nor are you parsing 180k dps”.
Your argument that GH is bad because everyone plays the same build while at the same time defending Veng where everyone plays the same build, frankly baffles me.
Thats simply not true. I have seen a huge variety of classes in Vengeance. There are even pure necromancers running around again! Which is simply unheard of in GH.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »MincMincMinc wrote: »Four_Fingers wrote: »When Vengeance finally goes live and the seasoned PvP players that have been sitting it out return, I wonder how long it will be till posts show up whining that they are still getting killed.
Did this actually happen? Lol. I'm genuinely asking because I like to play both GH and the Vengeance test but the only ones that were whining were the GH sweats that didn't have their crutches available in Vengeance, lol
Yeah I noticed alot of people complaining that veng was only for zergs and how it was impossible to solo. Then I and a few others had no issues 1vXing and doing all the same things I normally would. I could still pull people into towers or chokeholds to 1vX. I could make a group and kite enemies into seige spots like trapping enemies in holes then oiling them.
Maybe its just because Im an old PvPer who remembers smallman pvping without all of the handholding most "elite" coordinated groups have with their group stacking sets that give them 10x a normal player's stats while fully immune to all CC. IDK it feels like the 2014-2015 era pvp where you needed map knowledge and actual kiting skills.
Vengeance has NEVER felt anything like live Cyrodiil. It's always been a stripped down zerg fest where the only thing that matters is the size of the zerg. Vengeance has never been and never will be anything like live Cyrodiil. That's why vengeance will never be a legitimate preparation for live Cyrodiil as well.
I have seen a lot of 1vxing going on, and small scale as well, so this simply is not true. Cyrodiil was however BUILT for zerging, that was kind of the whole point, so if you see more of that, and you see bigger groups again because the game isnt a slide show, that is a good thing in my book.
Performance has been terrible, and ranged builds are limited to melee range... so whats the point? How is this fun? Guess im not playing ESO for a week then...
28 meters isnt melee range.....
Jammy420
8
Re: DLAA flicker
I have finally found a fix:
Download NVIDIA DLSS DLL 2.1.55 from this page:
https://www.techpowerup.com/download/nvidia-dlss-dll/
(scroll down bellow)
extract and copy "nvngx_dlss.dll" to the ESO main folder and overwrite.
That´s all.
No more flickering.
Download NVIDIA DLSS DLL 2.1.55 from this page:
https://www.techpowerup.com/download/nvidia-dlss-dll/
(scroll down bellow)
extract and copy "nvngx_dlss.dll" to the ESO main folder and overwrite.
That´s all.
No more flickering.
p6kocka
2
Re: QoL: Make CP number on character screen update for every character, PLEASE!
I don't care.
Currently as they don't update it I see it as when did I last login to any particular character. There is some use for me in that regard.
But I would not care if they changed it to how you want.
Currently as they don't update it I see it as when did I last login to any particular character. There is some use for me in that regard.
But I would not care if they changed it to how you want.
ankeor
1
Re: Nevermind
Greetings,
We are going to go ahead and close this thread as per the request of the original poster.
The Elder Scrolls Online Team
We are going to go ahead and close this thread as per the request of the original poster.
The Elder Scrolls Online Team
ZOS_Icy
1
Re: How would you streamline the release schedule?
i would not change it, ZOS is releasing things when they are ready which seems best to me.
i am guessing it will likely be the same kind of schedule every year.
- January, first season of the year (except this year)
- March, first update.
- April, second season.
- June, update.
- July, third season.
- late August or early September, update.
- October, fourth season.
- late October or early November, fourth update.
Each update adding the next Season. Features like Class or Werewolf refresh release with update launch.
Each season is 3 full months, events and some features like trials or stories release after their update during the season.
got the above picture from the Seasons intro post:
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/69137
ZOS also released a season roadmap with the launch of season 0, the same will likely happen with each future season.
They have gotten better with giving dates for things in advance, we know Zeal of Zenithar's dates 2 months in advance.
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/roadmap
hopefully my comment helps a bit.
i am guessing it will likely be the same kind of schedule every year.
- January, first season of the year (except this year)
- March, first update.
- April, second season.
- June, update.
- July, third season.
- late August or early September, update.
- October, fourth season.
- late October or early November, fourth update.
Each update adding the next Season. Features like Class or Werewolf refresh release with update launch.
Each season is 3 full months, events and some features like trials or stories release after their update during the season.
got the above picture from the Seasons intro post:
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/news/post/69137
ZOS also released a season roadmap with the launch of season 0, the same will likely happen with each future season.
They have gotten better with giving dates for things in advance, we know Zeal of Zenithar's dates 2 months in advance.
https://www.elderscrollsonline.com/en-us/roadmap
hopefully my comment helps a bit.
Re: It’s Time. Drop the Class System.
To start with, classes were the primary way of making exclusionary choices for your character. By choosing a class, you put the skill lines of the other classes out of reach, and that meant foor other classes, for a total of twelve skill lines. Then they added Necromancer, Warden and Arcanist, so now it's twenty-one excluded skill lines. (I don't understand why people still
appear to want more).
Race is similar, but there are only sets of minor passives involved there. Race could have been the primary vehicle for exclusion, but they picked class instead.
At some point, someone decided that twenty-one unavailable skill lines was too much, so sub-classing was brought in. It probably went too far in allowing two lines to be swapped out, but that's debatable. Either way, all skill lines are on the table for an existing character, which is good, but the player still has to make a choice of which to exclude. As with all compromises, not everyone is going to happy, especially those who don't understand why they can't have everything.
Classic D&D goes to the opposite extreme, with the choice of class excluding armor and weapon choices, types of spells etc. Early TES single-player games had aspects of that, but more graded. Wearing heavy armor might make you unable to cast much of a spell, for example, but didn't prevent it completely. ESO retains some biases in that direction, but it's possible to be a staff-wielding tank in light armor if you try.
So the real question here is what skills to we want to tie to, or exclude because of, other skills? Do we link armor to weapon, so Heavy armor can't use staves? Light can't use shields? Do we tone that down to making the skills weaker (which gets implemented as synergies to make it look positive)? They're currently doing the cross-skill-line synergy thing in the class overhauls, I notice.
If every player can cherry-pick without consequences, it becomes a uniform boring result, because at any time there will be a best choice. We need some sticky decisions that the player has to make, and live with, or there won't be ANY identity. Class is as good as any.
appear to want more).
Race is similar, but there are only sets of minor passives involved there. Race could have been the primary vehicle for exclusion, but they picked class instead.
At some point, someone decided that twenty-one unavailable skill lines was too much, so sub-classing was brought in. It probably went too far in allowing two lines to be swapped out, but that's debatable. Either way, all skill lines are on the table for an existing character, which is good, but the player still has to make a choice of which to exclude. As with all compromises, not everyone is going to happy, especially those who don't understand why they can't have everything.
Classic D&D goes to the opposite extreme, with the choice of class excluding armor and weapon choices, types of spells etc. Early TES single-player games had aspects of that, but more graded. Wearing heavy armor might make you unable to cast much of a spell, for example, but didn't prevent it completely. ESO retains some biases in that direction, but it's possible to be a staff-wielding tank in light armor if you try.
So the real question here is what skills to we want to tie to, or exclude because of, other skills? Do we link armor to weapon, so Heavy armor can't use staves? Light can't use shields? Do we tone that down to making the skills weaker (which gets implemented as synergies to make it look positive)? They're currently doing the cross-skill-line synergy thing in the class overhauls, I notice.
If every player can cherry-pick without consequences, it becomes a uniform boring result, because at any time there will be a best choice. We need some sticky decisions that the player has to make, and live with, or there won't be ANY identity. Class is as good as any.
ghastley
2
Re: Lack of sanitary items
It's funny, in many MMOs with housing, the bathroom isn't thought about. My ships and houses in swtor many years ago, no bathroom. ESO has no bathroom. In fallout 76, they started releasing bathroom items and I was awe struck. Such a simple thing, a shower, a toilet and a sink to place as you please. Yes it's a more modern setting, meaning it's very obvious when your build is missing it, and the world has tons of bathrooms but these poor citizens of Tamriel. Maybe this explains all the cults and trouble. The 3 banners war, because the white gold tower has a bathroom.
twisttop138
11